Cyborg semantics

General chat about fembots, technosexual culture or any other ASFR related topics that do not fit into the other categories below.
Post Reply
User avatar
Sentient6
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:35 am
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
x 1
Contact:

Cyborg semantics

Post by Sentient6 » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:56 am

Does it irk anyone else when the term cyborg is used incorrectly in fiction? More specifically, when "cyborg" is referring to something that seems to just be a robot. I can't think of many specific examples off the top of my head, but, for instance, wasn't Angelina Jolie's character in Cyborg 2 basically just a robot that looked human? I don't remember there being any mention of her having any organic components other than her outer flesh looking human (which may have been inorganic anyway). I have a similar problem with the terminators being called cyborgs, since all their organic parts are just an outer covering and they all seem to function independently without it.

Generally I feel like it doesn't really count as a cyborg unless there's something organic remaining in the brain. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems to make sense. I wish I could think of more examples besides the two I mentioned, but I definitely have run into more in fiction (not always explicitly so, but sometimes heavily implied).

User avatar
jolshefsky
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 12:26 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Rochester, NY
x 11
x 34
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by jolshefsky » Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:53 am

Nothing I can do about it but complain ... a cyborg is organic, generally mostly human, but with a substantial part replaced by machine; a robot is fully mechanical/electrical with no organic parts; and an android/gynoid is a robot that looks like a human (ergo, no organic parts). How is this so hard to understand?

I'm on the other side of the desires, so I want an android. Often, though, "android" seems to mean "any being not born" and includes clones/slaves. Bums me out. I think fondly of Cyborg 2 which was actually androids – but that's my kink. I understand your frustration ... the movie has "cyborg" in its title, but there is not a single cyborg in it. Same for "Cyborg Conquest". Peculiarly "Nemesis" is more of a cyborg and android movie.

I apologize for bothering to post this ... nothing new here! Oh well.
May your deeds return to you tenfold,

--- Jason Olshefsky

User avatar
Sentient6
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:35 am
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
x 1
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by Sentient6 » Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:49 am

On a similar note, I got really annoyed when there was a list of "Top 5 Robots in Video Games" (I think it was a Lisa Foiles video on the escapist) and a bunch of dipshits in the comments section were complaining about KOS-MOS from Xenosaga shouldn't be on the list because "she's an ANDROID, not a ROBOT!" Fuck. Squares and rectangles, people.

User avatar
dale coba
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 9:05 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia
x 12
x 13

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by dale coba » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:27 pm

"Cyborg" - the term was well-situated in popular culture when Martin Caiden's book was popular enough to get a show on ABC. Then they went with "bionic" instead, but there's room enough for both terms.

"Cyborg" has been mistreated many times since then. I think newbees want to use it to mark the ruthlessness or inhumanity of the creature's behavior. Especially shortened as Borg, it's a hard sound, deep and booming.

Sometimes, what matters is how much meat there is. Other times what matters more is along the axis of thinking/sentience vs. programmed unthinking machine.

- Dale Coba
8) :!: :nerd: :idea: : :nerd: :shock: :lovestruck: [ :twisted: :dancing: :oops: :wink: :twisted: ] = [ :drooling: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :party:... ... :applause: :D :lovestruck: :notworthy: :rockon: ]

User avatar
BA2
Posts: 500
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: UK
x 193
x 215
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by BA2 » Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:48 am

As far as I can tell the terms robot and cyborg are defined only by writers' convention rather than by any deeper etymological reasons.

Whilst I agree with the usage above myself (robot = machine; android / gynoid = machine looking like a human; cyborg = enhanced human) confusion is bound to arise since the word robot was first used to mean a 'zombified' human worker ["R.U.R." by Karel ÄŒapek, 1920] and the word cyborg derives from 'cybernetic organism' which suggests what we mostly now agree to be a robot...!

Funnily enough 'android' is an older word than robot but has always been a bit ambiguous, meaning either mechanical or squishy construction. 'Automaton' is a great and clear word, though a bit archaic sounding, and clearly means mechanical.

Words are very random!

BA

King Snarf
Posts: 909
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 9:02 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Drexel Hill, PA
x 5
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by King Snarf » Fri Apr 12, 2013 3:37 am

I usually use "automaton" for old-timey steampunk robots.

User avatar
Hayley Anachronism
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:46 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Cyborg
Gender: Female
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by Hayley Anachronism » Fri Apr 12, 2013 3:29 pm

Terminology has never really bothered me as long as it's internally consistent and I know what it's trying to describe. Honestly, look at the evolution of terminology for computers over the years. They started out as "electronic brains," evolved into PCs, to the point where now they're so ubiquitous we don't even refer to them as such. It's "my smartphone" or "my tablet," describing their shape or function rather than their nature. I imagine it'll be the same way with robots and androids/gynoids in the future. Who knows, maybe implants and/or mind uploading will be as ubiquitous and inconsequential as tattoos or body/facial piercing today (I have a prominent nose piercing. If I was born even ten years earlier, I'd never be able to find work, but now I have no difficulty).

What interests me more is how the terminology of cyborgs/androids/etc reflects the times and the zeitgeist of the particular point in history or geography where it was made. Heck, the word for "computer monitor" in Iceland is derived from the lens of the human eye.
Reality is just a vacation.

--NightBattery--

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by --NightBattery-- » Fri Apr 12, 2013 7:12 pm

ill just drop two things quickly.

If a cyborg is an organism enhaced by technology and has a control system... then people with peace makers, are, by definition: cyborgs.

and about the terminology, i think Hayley brings an interesting point, now chemical kits and other stuff in science are known more by the brand than by what it is (its kinda sad), juts like computers and other consumer electronics and cars are, so perhaps, in the distant not dystopic-energyless future robots might, as well, be known by their brand or manufacturer. and maybe, just maybe all the jargon we use today... even if correct in those times, will be, obsolete and fool.

Regards.

User avatar
dale coba
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 9:05 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia
x 12
x 13

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by dale coba » Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:26 pm

--Battery-- wrote:If a cyborg is an organism enhanced by technology and has a control system... then people with pace makers, are, by definition: cyborgs.
Before the pace maker, there was the iron lung. Huge, noisy, with many patients stuck lying in one until their eventual death. It's like the least convenient human+tech=cyborg ever. (my candidate for the same in fiction: TOS Captain Pike and his monumentally stupid 23rd century wheelchair. Beep.)

- Dale Coba
8) :!: :nerd: :idea: : :nerd: :shock: :lovestruck: [ :twisted: :dancing: :oops: :wink: :twisted: ] = [ :drooling: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :party:... ... :applause: :D :lovestruck: :notworthy: :rockon: ]

--NightBattery--

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by --NightBattery-- » Fri Apr 12, 2013 9:17 pm

im a star wars person so let's see..oh
we got visual.
Image
what the....

User avatar
Spaz
Fembot Central Staff
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:18 am
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: San Jose, CA
x 134
x 134
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by Spaz » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:53 pm

How about this?

Image
Check out my stories: https://www.fembotwiki.com/index.php?title=User:Spaz

Current story status: The Small Business Chronicles: Season Two | The Doctor is in - The Clinic (In progress...)

User avatar
Hayley Anachronism
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:46 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Cyborg
Gender: Female
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by Hayley Anachronism » Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:41 am

She looked better with the chalky skin and giant thing coming out of her eye socket. ;)
Reality is just a vacation.

King Snarf
Posts: 909
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 9:02 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Drexel Hill, PA
x 5
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by King Snarf » Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:22 am

dale coba wrote:
--Battery-- wrote:If a cyborg is an organism enhanced by technology and has a control system... then people with pace makers, are, by definition: cyborgs.
Before the pace maker, there was the iron lung. Huge, noisy, with many patients stuck lying in one until their eventual death. It's like the least convenient human+tech=cyborg ever. (my candidate for the same in fiction: TOS Captain Pike and his monumentally stupid 23rd century wheelchair. Beep.)

- Dale Coba
Stupid? Yes. But it gave us some great gags on Futurama. :wink:

User avatar
Sentient6
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:35 am
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
x 1
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by Sentient6 » Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:56 pm

Use the beeps!

User avatar
Spaz
Fembot Central Staff
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:18 am
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: San Jose, CA
x 134
x 134
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by Spaz » Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:05 pm

Hayley Anachronism wrote:She looked better with the chalky skin and giant thing coming out of her eye socket. ;)
This better?

Image
Check out my stories: https://www.fembotwiki.com/index.php?title=User:Spaz

Current story status: The Small Business Chronicles: Season Two | The Doctor is in - The Clinic (In progress...)

User avatar
Hayley Anachronism
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:46 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Cyborg
Gender: Female
Contact:

Re: Cyborg semantics

Post by Hayley Anachronism » Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:34 am

She needs one or two more cables coming out of her and maybe some cyberlox but yes. Yes it is. ;)
Reality is just a vacation.

Post Reply
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests