Please Contact Me With Your Feedback

General chat about fembots, technosexual culture or any other ASFR related topics that do not fit into the other categories below.
Post Reply
Doug_TrueCompanion
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: US
Contact:

Please Contact Me With Your Feedback

Post by Doug_TrueCompanion » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:41 pm

Hello, this is Douglas Hines from True Companion!

Thank you for the opportunity to follow up with you and to let you know that I have been and continue to be part of our community. We at True Companion are very excited to bring together engineers from some of the best robotics organizations and produce some remarkable products!

We have started to post videos online with demos. Please review them and email/call us anytime of day or night with any questions.

I realize that this is so new and many people have questions... Please email me or call and we will follow up with you.

Over the coming weeks and months, we will have many more announcements.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Douglas

Douglas Hines
www.TrueCompanion.com
DHines@TrueCompanion.com

KingJeremy

Post by KingJeremy » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:10 pm

DUN DUN DUNNNNN!!!

Doug_TrueCompanion
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: US
Contact:

Post by Doug_TrueCompanion » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:28 pm

Hey King Jeremy.

I am also still up :)

I would really like to follow up with you. I will be working for at least another hour or so...

Would you pls call me at 800-509-1730 ext 707?

I look forward to speaking with you!

Tks.

Regards,

Douglas

Doug_TrueCompanion
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: US
Contact:

Post by Doug_TrueCompanion » Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:44 am

Hi Robotman.

I need your input.

Please take a look at our Blog at www.TrueCompanion.com and www.TrueCompanionTV.com and then either call or email me.

We are making public several advances which we have kept under wraps.

I have spent many months travelling and a significant amount of money to make this dream come true for all of us. I have been personally funding this out of my love for technology and to bring some fantastic products to market to help people.

Please contact me after you check out our presentations.

I would like to follow up with you.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Douglas

Douglas Hines
DHines@TrueCompanion.com
www.TrueCompanion.com

KingJeremy

Post by KingJeremy » Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:20 pm

Doug, no offense but I really don't care one way or the other about the outcome of your project. I really don't mean that in a derogatory manner either, it's just that I am strictly into the fantasy/idea of female robots/gynoids than actual female robots/gynoids. I like real women creating the illusion that they are artificial rather than an artificial woman masquerading as a real one.

That being said I do support those members who do look forward to one day being able to interact with their own fembot and after having read several posts regarding your work and an especially interesting piece by Mr. Levy, my post was basically a joking preface to the shitstorm that I thought your post would elicit. However, it looks like most here chose the classy route and have decided to ignore it altogether.

User avatar
tinyspider
Posts: 507
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 3:21 pm
Location: Colombia, South America
x 11
Contact:

Post by tinyspider » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:43 pm

KingJeremy wrote:Doug, no offense but I really don't care one way or the other about the outcome of your project. I really don't mean that in a derogatory manner either, it's just that I am strictly into the fantasy/idea of female robots/gynoids than actual female robots/gynoids. I like real women creating the illusion that they are artificial rather than an artificial woman masquerading as a real one.

That being said I do support those members who do look forward to one day being able to interact with their own fembot and after having read several posts regarding your work and an especially interesting piece by Mr. Levy, my post was basically a joking preface to the shitstorm that I thought your post would elicit. However, it looks like most here chose the classy route and have decided to ignore it altogether.
I don't wanna be classy :lol:, I guess most members here don't really give two shits about it, but after reading all the controversy and ways of Mr. 'doug-not-so-true-companion' I just wonder why mods haven't banned this guy yet... he's not doing us a favor, nor is he contributing in any positive way to the community, but since this is not my board... well, to each his own I guess

User avatar
fnord
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:40 am
Technosexuality: None of your business
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Betty White for President!
Contact:

Post by fnord » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:23 am

Okay, I'm board

I agree with araenae,

As nothing about Doug's gollem can be construed as "classy". I will be classic in my question to Doug. ------> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug75diEyiA0

I am VERY disappointed with Doug's "he-she" and sickened by the slug being revisited again and again..add nauseam.
"I have seen the fnords"

Doug_TrueCompanion
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: US
Contact:

Post by Doug_TrueCompanion » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:28 am

Hi King Jeremy, thanks for the reply.

I understand totally.

:)

Hi araenae. I also appreciate your post.

I look forward to also responding to any questions you have.

Hi fnord. We have various faces - so that way you can have one which is the hottest for you.

We'll get those faces up shortly.

We have recently had visitors to our office and had a third party interact with Roxxxy. We have created a new face for her and are also planning to have other visitors meet her. As a matter of fact, someone who is a member of Fembot Central forum met her. Hopefully he will post here with his feedback.

I am available by phone pretty much any time and by email to answer any questions.

Tks.

Best regards,

Douglas

Douglas Hines
DHines@TrueCompanion.com
www.TrueCompanion.com

Doug_TrueCompanion
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: US
Contact:

Post by Doug_TrueCompanion » Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:34 am

Hey Robotman.

We'll post some other images.

I will also do a better job of communicating with everyone about our work so that way it is a bit clearer.

Tks.

Best regards,

Douglas
DHines@TrueCompanion.com
www.TrueCompanion.com

User avatar
keraptis
Posts: 790
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 5:02 am
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Northeast U.S.
Contact:

Post by keraptis » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:45 pm

KingJeremy wrote:Doug, no offense but I really don't care one way or the other about the outcome of your project. I really don't mean that in a derogatory manner either, it's just that I am strictly into the fantasy/idea of female robots/gynoids than actual female robots/gynoids. I like real women creating the illusion that they are artificial rather than an artificial woman masquerading as a real one.

That being said I do support those members who do look forward to one day being able to interact with their own fembot
and after having read several posts regarding your work and an especially interesting piece by Mr. Levy, my post was basically a joking preface to the shitstorm that I thought your post would elicit. However, it looks like most here chose the classy route and have decided to ignore it altogether.
I'm one of those people putting this thread mostly on ignore ... but I wanted to take this opportunity to state just how strongly I agree with the bolded statements above.

The day that somebody makes a real "sex robot" that people can try out in the privacy of their own home is going to be a huge day around this forum. Just not for me.

Doug_TrueCompanion
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: US
Contact:

Post by Doug_TrueCompanion » Thu Aug 12, 2010 2:53 am

Tks Kishin.

I know that this is soooo new and I know that we need to do a better job of communicating. And I also know that we needed to maximize her beauty :) we have made totally new faces for her... so, we are working on this and other areas.

This was and will be a long road. But it is a fun road.

Tks.

Best regards,

Douglas
DHines@TrueCompanion.com
www.TrueCompanion.com

Doug_TrueCompanion
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:40 pm
Location: US
Contact:

Post by Doug_TrueCompanion » Thu Aug 12, 2010 5:55 am

Tks Robotman for your post. We will provide additional videos and information to help clarify the features.

Best regards,

Douglas
DHnies@TrueCompanion.com
www.TrueCompanion.com

User avatar
PsychoKirby
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:26 am
Contact:

Post by PsychoKirby » Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:54 am

Are you familiar with Project Aiko, Mr. Hines? She can read text, move her arms, move her head to follow moving objects, perform mathemtical equations, identify objects presented to her, tell the weather, and hold a conversation (with a text-to-speech synthesizer so she isn't limited to pre-recorded statements). Aiko was designed by a single person over a few years with nothing more than the money from his own pocket. You claim TrueCompanion was designed by a team of top experts over a decade with a sizable budget. If everything you say is true, then common sense dictates that TrueCompanion must be better than Project Aiko, and I want to hear why. I don't need pictures or videos or anything else that you can't show me until later. Just a simple explanation as to why TrueCompanion is more advanced.

And I realize I asked this before, but I didn't get an answer then, and I have a feeling I won't get one now either.
<b><i>"To you, a robot is a robot. Gears and metal; electricity and positrons. Mind and iron! Human-made! If necessary, human-destroyed! But you haven't worked with them, so you don't know them. They're a cleaner, better breed than we are."</i></b>

Post Reply
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests