Surrogates review/commentary thread

Share or request information and reviews on various forms of fembot media.
(Please use the search option before requesting a review as it may have been covered in the past)
Post Reply
droidlvr
Banned
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 5:40 pm
x 2

Post by droidlvr » Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:49 am

there were a couple of moments in the film where I was on the verge of pulling a Pee Wee Herman,
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Almost fell out after reading that man!!! Thanks for your honesty dude. Now I know I must go see this flick.

User avatar
rickdrat
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 6:54 am
Location: Location, Location
x 2
x 4
Contact:

Re: Surrogates review/commentary thread

Post by rickdrat » Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:50 am

Kishin wrote: there were a couple of moments in the film where I was on the verge of pulling a Pee Wee Herman
...and you don't want to get caught pulling your Pee Wee in a theater. :lol:


Thanks for the review, Kishin. I'm planning on screening this one myself sometime next week.

mrwankel78
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 7:38 am
Contact:

Post by mrwankel78 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:58 am

thanks Kishin :idea:

User avatar
MisterXYZ (RoboTomo)
Posts: 297
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:45 am
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Android
Gender: Male
Location: Chicago, IL, USA, North America, the planet Earth
x 1
x 1
Contact:

Post by MisterXYZ (RoboTomo) » Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:03 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 1/2

The movie is great. It loses points for very few female robots, but it gained more than that for the action packed buisness!

(What? I like a few action movies 'ere and there.)
--Mister XYZ (Robo Tomo)--

The most progressive robot since 2006.

Blood type: WMD-40; Batteries: 20 AAs, 10 AAAs, and 5 Cs; Measurements: Classified; Date of Creation: 05012006; Rest of Bios: Classified

rs5420
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:34 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
x 72
x 5
Contact:

Post by rs5420 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:03 pm

Thanks for your truly excellent impressions on that new flick, Kishin!!!

User avatar
code_author
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 8:41 pm
Contact:

Post by code_author » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:04 pm

Thanks for the excellent review Kish, I'll be going this week coming up.

:D

User avatar
PsychoKirby
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:26 am
Contact:

Post by PsychoKirby » Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:20 pm

Thanks for the review. It's clear you put a lot of thought into this. Would you recommend it to someone who's not big on action movies, though? Because I'm not, and if all it can offer me is ASFR I'll just wait for some vidcaps.
<b><i>"To you, a robot is a robot. Gears and metal; electricity and positrons. Mind and iron! Human-made! If necessary, human-destroyed! But you haven't worked with them, so you don't know them. They're a cleaner, better breed than we are."</i></b>

User avatar
MisterXYZ (RoboTomo)
Posts: 297
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:45 am
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Android
Gender: Male
Location: Chicago, IL, USA, North America, the planet Earth
x 1
x 1
Contact:

Post by MisterXYZ (RoboTomo) » Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:21 pm

I never said this about your review, but you make a very great point about "Surrogates".

I am very disappointed about this movie not being a box-office hit this opening weekend. It lost by $9.6 Million to "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs". :(

That Dreamworks movie has got nothing on Surrogates! This is a great movie, "Surrogates", I mean.

Thank you for the review! :lol:
--Mister XYZ (Robo Tomo)--

The most progressive robot since 2006.

Blood type: WMD-40; Batteries: 20 AAs, 10 AAAs, and 5 Cs; Measurements: Classified; Date of Creation: 05012006; Rest of Bios: Classified

User avatar
jolshefsky
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 12:26 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Rochester, NY
x 11
x 34
Contact:

Filthy Critic (not surprisingly) hated it

Post by jolshefsky » Mon Sep 28, 2009 5:37 am

In The Filthy Critic's review, he hated it. I'm not surprised and if it weren't for the robot women, I would probably hate it too (I'll wait for it to hit the 2nd-run theater by my girlfriend's house). I've watched much much worse movies for the specific purpose of the robot women.
May your deeds return to you tenfold,

--- Jason Olshefsky

User avatar
PsychoKirby
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:26 am
Contact:

Post by PsychoKirby » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:00 am

MisterXYZ (RoboTomo) wrote: That Dreamworks movie has got nothing on Surrogates! This is a great movie, "Surrogates", I mean.
It's actually by Sony Animation. Sorry to nitpick, but I felt I should say it. At least you aren't one of those people who thinks every animated movie ever is Disney, though. :lol:

Anyway, thanks a lot for your thoughts, Kishin. I might see it this weekend.
<b><i>"To you, a robot is a robot. Gears and metal; electricity and positrons. Mind and iron! Human-made! If necessary, human-destroyed! But you haven't worked with them, so you don't know them. They're a cleaner, better breed than we are."</i></b>

User avatar
zapped
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:38 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Down in the lab
x 3
Contact:

Post by zapped » Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:43 pm

Can you elaborate on the people standing upright in harnesses on the sidewalks? Are they being re-charged in those booths? Is there more shown than just the two seen in the background of the preview clips?

Going to see this at 9:45 tonight and can't wait! :lol:
"Your beauty will be preserved forever, my darling!"

User avatar
MisterXYZ (RoboTomo)
Posts: 297
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:45 am
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Android
Gender: Male
Location: Chicago, IL, USA, North America, the planet Earth
x 1
x 1
Contact:

Post by MisterXYZ (RoboTomo) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:34 pm

PsychoKirby wrote:
MisterXYZ (RoboTomo) wrote: That Dreamworks movie has got nothing on Surrogates! This is a great movie, "Surrogates", I mean.
It's actually by Sony Animation. Sorry to nitpick, but I felt I should say it. At least you aren't one of those people who thinks every animated movie ever is Disney, though. :lol:

Anyway, thanks a lot for your thoughts, Kishin. I might see it this weekend.
My bad. I made a mistake.
--Mister XYZ (Robo Tomo)--

The most progressive robot since 2006.

Blood type: WMD-40; Batteries: 20 AAs, 10 AAAs, and 5 Cs; Measurements: Classified; Date of Creation: 05012006; Rest of Bios: Classified

User avatar
zapped
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:38 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Down in the lab
x 3
Contact:

Post by zapped » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:04 pm

Very good movie and like Kishin said; Plenty of blank, deactivated stares. I found myself swallowing hard in my throat and mumbling, "Oh damn!" when the scene where they go to the pawn shop/second hand store came along. They were looking for a replacement surrogate body, and I believe that scene alone will go down in ASFR history. My only regret was that I didn't have the old pause button handy!

I will certainly be at best buy the day this comes out on DVD. :D
"Your beauty will be preserved forever, my darling!"

User avatar
jolshefsky
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 12:26 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Rochester, NY
x 11
x 34
Contact:

Re: Filthy Critic (not surprisingly) hated it

Post by jolshefsky » Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:18 am

jolshefsky wrote:In The Filthy Critic's review, he hated it.
And I saw it last night. And I hated it. The movie itself had a plot so thin and pointless, I really should have just stayed home.

As for the ASFR content, for some reason it didn't do anything for me. I can spend any day finding pretty girls and pretending they are robots, and the movie is totally almost completely GINO. Bruce Willis' character, as a robot, gets pretty damaged, but not a single female surrogate is damaged. Well, except for the girl in the beginning, but it's really just her eyes being burned and broken.

The scene in the trailer with the face-off is exactly the same in the movie (there is nothing more: Greer's wife Maggie works in a surrogate salon of sorts and she takes a girl's face off to work on it; no casual smalltalk afterword or any more shots -- even though Maggie pauses her surrogate, leaving the customer sitting there with no face.)

In fact, every single scene featuring a female surrogate in some appealing way is shown in the trailer in its entirety. Except for the pawn shop, but by the time they get around to it in the film, it did nothing for me.

I did like that the surrogates don't tend to express emotion, so when the operator is upset or angry, their surrogate maintains a relatively neutral facial expression.

And there is a scene early-on with a landlady who's annoyed by her nearly useless "loaner surrey" while hers is in the shop; however, the CGI there is so bad, it might as well have been from Lawnmower Man. Basically she's got a face stuck on a robot head, and clumsy hands. The lighting on her face is frustratingly incongruous, and her clothing is right off the "business formless" page of the JC Penney catalog.

So my advice is to go in with very low expectations. If you use a lot of imagination, the movie can be ASFR. The mass deactivation scene at the end left me with some ideas (I'm sure there are still some working parts on all those bots ...), and the pretty people everywhere is okay, and the brief shots of charging stations are okay, and the surrogate freezes are okay. If any of those things is your kink, then this is totally your movie.

But if you're like me and want to see visual proof of a woman being a robot, the images and trailer is all there is in the whole movie (and there's not even a close-up of the cut-away robot woman like the promo still photo floating around). Starting from photos and the trailer, my imagination created a better fantasy than what was actually presented.
May your deeds return to you tenfold,

--- Jason Olshefsky

droidlvr
Banned
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 5:40 pm
x 2

Post by droidlvr » Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:24 am

I for one thank you jolshefsky for your honest review of the movie.I downloaded this from the internet,didn't even reach the ending before deleting. Am I correct in my thinking that you reviewed 2040, ya know the movie I did pay for ?

Svengli
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:47 pm
x 30
x 8
Contact:

Post by Svengli » Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:06 pm

Hmm,

I can't imagine Hollywood will every make a Gynoid movie as good for me as the original Stepford Wives. But even that only has moments, albeit great moments.

I thought surrogates as a film fit the relatively common would-be-good-if-it-weren't-for-the-chase-scenes pattern.

I'm more a fan of robotishness than malfunctions/damage myself. Some of the images of the agent with his wife's surrogate were pretty good for me and scene of the female agent being killed and her surrogate hijacked was excellent for me.

But that shows that we're often looking for different things even within this fetish. Thank you.

Svengli
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:47 pm
x 30
x 8
Contact:

Post by Svengli » Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:15 pm

And ... while Surrogates is poor movie, I found reading "the filthy critic"'s lurid prose is at least twice as subjectively painful as watching the movie (fast forward is great..). If they'd pull the damn chase scenes, Surrogates would rank with something like Logan's run as a mediocre parable of the modern world. No scifi movie is logical, they're all metaphor for the present world. Not great but hardly deserves that kind of treatment.

Post Reply
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 38 guests