danbooru

T-elos/Thurosis · Post by **T-elos/Thurosis** » Sat Apr 18, 2009 7:48 pm

At the page from danbooru you can find a lot of anime android pics

here is the link

[[LINK REMOVED]]

(try other tags like "robot" or "cyborg" or what ever)

i hope this gallery is allowed

dubhdanaidh · Post by **dubhdanaidh** » Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:27 pm

T-elos/Thurosis · Post by **T-elos/Thurosis** » Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:40 pm

sorry.... -___-

btw the does anyone know from where this comes from?
(found it on fembotwiki
and it is somekind interessting

dubhdanaidh · Post by **dubhdanaidh** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:45 am

DukeNukem 2417 · Post by **DukeNukem 2417** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:48 am

dubhdanaidh wrote:Here's Germany's porn laws:

The German law is very strict about hardcore pornography, especially compared to the very liberal laws about softcore pornography, prostitution and sex shops. Providing hardcore pornography to a person under 18 is illegal, shops selling it must prevent people under the age of 18 from entering their premises (if only a part of the shop is dedicated to pornography, it must be completely closed off from the rest of the premises) or, alternatively, may not display their goods or advertise that they sell them. Websites hosting pornographic material within Germany must comply with very strict rules about verifying that viewers are over 18

There is a very wide definition of ch*ld p*rn*gr*phy, which includes images of all real or fictional people who either are under the age of 18 or who appear to be below 18 to an "average viewer". (In particular note this part) DISTRIBUTION of such material is prohibited, possession however is only banned if the material shows a real person below 18. Pornography involving violence or bestiality may not be produced or distributed but is legal to possess.

Therefore, don't post anything illegal. And if in doubt, DON'T post it.

Huh, deja vu. Haven't seen any "don't post material with underage girls" posts in about 5 months or so, but once again: I agree with that rule all the way. One question, dubhdanaidh: what's with the astericks in place of vowels?

maax · Post by **maax** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:57 am

So pervs do fast searches for the phrase, so by replacing the vowels with * it screws up the search.

dubhdanaidh · Post by **dubhdanaidh** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:27 am

Gorgo · Post by **Gorgo** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:59 am

Huh, deja vu. Haven't seen any "don't post material with underage girls" posts in about 5 months or so, but once again: I agree with that rule all the way. One question, dubhdanaidh: what's with the astericks in place of vowels?

And I really wish people would finally get that rule into their heads.

Sthurmovik · Post by **Sthurmovik** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:46 pm

I feel the rule goes a bit too far. A bots age is independent of what age their shell looks like. Fortunately the US Supreme Court agrees with me when it comes to non-real child images. I would suggest moving the site hosting to a country that respects civil liberties and free speech.

dubhdanaidh · Post by **dubhdanaidh** » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:29 pm