"Thrills"

Dreen89 · Post by **Dreen89** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:44 pm

can someone link me to a site or page with info on the following

http://www.fembotwiki.com/index.php?tit ... ls_vidcaps

droidlvr · Post by **droidlvr** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:05 pm

Wow,that looks good but if I remember those caps make the ASFR content/amount look more than it actually contains.

Dreen89 · Post by **Dreen89** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:45 pm

damn i was really hoping for something amazing. you got any good links to similar videos?

droidlvr · Post by **droidlvr** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:11 am

Before you take my word please wait for others to post their reviews.

noidguy · Post by **noidguy** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:19 am

If you use the "search" feature and look for "thrills" you'll come across some old threads on this subject. Here's one....

http://fembotcentral.com/viewtopic.php? ... ht=thrills

dingdongdug · Post by **dingdongdug** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:53 am

Hello have you got links for trills movie????

droidlvr · Post by **droidlvr** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:33 pm

Yep, Baron's review did it for me.

droidlvr · Post by **droidlvr** » Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:35 pm

I might add that I cannot overstate the value of a good contrite report on any material posted here.

dale coba · Post by **dale coba** » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:01 pm

droidlvr wrote:I might add that I cannot overstate the value of a good contrite report on any material posted here.

I regret the need to correct you here, but i think:
a) you meant to type "concise".
&
b) the clause "posted here" is misplaced, and should be moved so it refers to "report", and not "material".

I wouldn't normally correct an FC member in such matters, but as I have expressed myself with a spirit of contrition (as per your request), I hope you won't mind too much.

- Dale Coba

AK · Post by AK » Sat Feb 21, 2009 4:18 pm

[POST REMOVED]

droidlvr · Post by **droidlvr** » Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:34 pm

I set myself up for that one.

Now correct this.

droidlvr · Post by **droidlvr** » Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:42 pm

I wonder what's it like to live in New Hampshire.

AK · Post by AK » Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:25 pm

[POST REMOVED]

droidlvr · Post by **droidlvr** » Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:15 pm

Guess I failed at more than just grammar. My attempt at sarcasm failed as I am sure New Hampshire is among the top five vacation destinations in the U.S.

AK · Post by AK » Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:17 pm

[POST REMOVED]

~? · Post by ~? » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:08 am

Considering this thread has changed from a relevant topic to one concerning grammar, and since you "believe in judging others on their poor grammar", I'm certain you'll appreciate being corrected yourself.

AK wrote: And cows. Trees and cows.

These aren't sentences and can't be considered dependent clauses either as they lack verbs. Therefore, what you've written here are fragments.

AK wrote:Amateurs.

I wouldn't normally bother with nit-picking, but when someone makes such an arrogant statement I would assume he considers himself a "professional" and beyond reproach.

droidlvr · Post by **droidlvr** » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:22 am

Wow,I almost can't believe that we've barked at each other in the past.
I should have used the word concise and not contrite.

TheSpotConlon · Post by **TheSpotConlon** » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:57 am

Hey there! I'm going to get us back on topic, if that's okay.

"Thrills" is better-than-average Skinemax soft-core, the kind of movie which shows terrible, implausible sex from odd angles. The girls are much more attractive than your usual flick that runs after midnight, even if the guys are still meatheads and very few people involved know how to deliver their lines. It's amateur hour, but we're not here for the great theatrics.

As for robotic content, there's one scene where the girl plugs herself in, some dialogue referring to her robotic nature, and at least two instances where her eyes glow for no particular reason. Why exactly do robots eyes have to glow? Would you not know otherwise? It seems like a waste of resources. The movie refers to more ideas than it will ever back up with any kind of effect or explanation; there's a moment where the robot decides to erase all of her sexual knowledge, and then she slumps over and nothing else happens. If these sorts of scenes went one step further, then "Thrills" would be legendary. As it is, it's passably good erotica with a few decent fembot touches.

dale coba · Post by **dale coba** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:04 am

~? wrote:
AK wrote: And cows. Trees and cows.
These aren't sentences and can't be considered dependent clauses either as they lack verbs. Therefore, what you've written here are fragments.

As Galileo probably didn't actually say to the Papal Inquisition, "And yet it moves."
Fragments are no crime, when they communicate clearly.

~? wrote:
AK wrote:Amateurs.
I wouldn't normally bother with nit-picking, but when someone makes such an arrogant statement I would assume he considers himself a "professional" and beyond reproach.

Expletives are fine as fragments.

Sat.AMs, in the 1970's, ABCtv wrote:"In---terjections, .... show excitement, .... or emotion.
They're generally set apart from the sentence, by an exclamation point; or by a comma when the feeling's not as strong."

- Dale Coba
(a chip off the block of Schoolhouse Rock)

bot051723 · Post by **bot051723** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:56 am

dale coba wrote:
Sat.AMs, in the 1970's, ABCtv wrote:"In---terjections, .... show excitement, .... or emotion.
They're generally set apart from the sentence, by an exclamation point; or by a comma when the feeling's not as strong."

Sat.AMs, in the 1970's, ABCtv wrote:Conjunction Junction, what's your function?

Hooking up arms and legs and chassis...

AK · Post by AK » Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:23 pm

[POST REMOVED]