Robot Suit and control, who would you trust?
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:43 pm
- Contact:
Robot Suit and control, who would you trust?
This is a slightly different angle on the question of control.
To avoid all the issues of identity and transformation, let's assume that a 'robot suit' exists, a skin-tight bodysuit full of electronics that you could put on. Once you put it on, you can be controlled completely by someone else, just like a robot, you can't even take it off without his/her consent. You're still you, but you are now a puppet on a string.
What I'm asking is who you'd give the strings to? Who you'd would trust with complete control over you? Who would you be willing to give the remote control unit to? A spouse? Your parent or your child? Best friend? Random stranger? Do you know anyone you'd be willing to surrender control over yourself that way to?
The attached poll is just to get an idea of who people would trust with that kind of power over them. After all, becoming or being a 'bot is likely to involve that kind of lack of freedom, so to me it's an interesting question, even if we're just talking about the fantasy of it.
To avoid all the issues of identity and transformation, let's assume that a 'robot suit' exists, a skin-tight bodysuit full of electronics that you could put on. Once you put it on, you can be controlled completely by someone else, just like a robot, you can't even take it off without his/her consent. You're still you, but you are now a puppet on a string.
What I'm asking is who you'd give the strings to? Who you'd would trust with complete control over you? Who would you be willing to give the remote control unit to? A spouse? Your parent or your child? Best friend? Random stranger? Do you know anyone you'd be willing to surrender control over yourself that way to?
The attached poll is just to get an idea of who people would trust with that kind of power over them. After all, becoming or being a 'bot is likely to involve that kind of lack of freedom, so to me it's an interesting question, even if we're just talking about the fantasy of it.
- Stephaniebot
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 12:13 pm
- Technosexuality: Transformation
- Identification: Android
- Gender: Transgendered
- Location: Huddersfield
- x 2
- Contact:
- Brianna 1365 Gamma
- Banned
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 2:12 pm
- Location: USA
- xodar
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: South Texas
- x 1
- Contact:
I wouldn't trust anybody, so I wouldn't do it.
However, it sounds like an excellent way to control prisoners and parolees.
However, it sounds like an excellent way to control prisoners and parolees.
"You can believe me, because I never lie and I'm always right." -- George Leroy Tirebiter.
If a tree falls in the forest and there's nobody there to hear it I don't give a rat's ass.
http://www.bbotw.com/product.aspx?ISBN=0-7414-4384-8
http://www.bbotw.com/description.asp?ISBN=0-7414-2058-9
If a tree falls in the forest and there's nobody there to hear it I don't give a rat's ass.
http://www.bbotw.com/product.aspx?ISBN=0-7414-4384-8
http://www.bbotw.com/description.asp?ISBN=0-7414-2058-9
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 9:11 pm
- Contact:
I'd never trust police or corrections officers with such power. They can already brutalize people with near-total impunity, and this just gives them more tools for the job. I've been tortured by police officers, and other people have been waterboarded with pepper spray, had nails driven under their fingernails, etc. by American police officers.xodar wrote:However, it sounds like an excellent way to control prisoners and parolees.
- Brianna 1365 Gamma
- Banned
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 2:12 pm
- Location: USA
- xodar
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: South Texas
- x 1
- Contact:
Well, those statements baffle me.
There are people who can't relate to anyone except by picking fights and hurting them. They have to be controlled and they aren't victims.
I'd think it's better simply to make it impossible -- with minimal physical harm -- for someone to go some places or perform some actions than it is to let them keep hurting people and rewarding them for their viciousness or to lock them up with no control there over their behavior.
There are people who can't relate to anyone except by picking fights and hurting them. They have to be controlled and they aren't victims.
I'd think it's better simply to make it impossible -- with minimal physical harm -- for someone to go some places or perform some actions than it is to let them keep hurting people and rewarding them for their viciousness or to lock them up with no control there over their behavior.
"You can believe me, because I never lie and I'm always right." -- George Leroy Tirebiter.
If a tree falls in the forest and there's nobody there to hear it I don't give a rat's ass.
http://www.bbotw.com/product.aspx?ISBN=0-7414-4384-8
http://www.bbotw.com/description.asp?ISBN=0-7414-2058-9
If a tree falls in the forest and there's nobody there to hear it I don't give a rat's ass.
http://www.bbotw.com/product.aspx?ISBN=0-7414-4384-8
http://www.bbotw.com/description.asp?ISBN=0-7414-2058-9
- Brianna 1365 Gamma
- Banned
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 2:12 pm
- Location: USA
- Stephaniebot
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 12:13 pm
- Technosexuality: Transformation
- Identification: Android
- Gender: Transgendered
- Location: Huddersfield
- x 2
- Contact:
As Brianna says, its a fine idea for those of us happy to get into 'said' robot suit if it existed to be controlled in that way, but a whole different ball game if it became non consensual in that manner, even for criminals.
The only thing is, she mentions about the controller releasing them when they wished to be. I assume this would have to be an agreed period in advance because once you have lost your free will, how do you say you want to be released?
I mean, even I might like a trial period (though I'm not saying how long!
) before committing to it long term, but I wouldnt necessarily put good money on it!
The only thing is, she mentions about the controller releasing them when they wished to be. I assume this would have to be an agreed period in advance because once you have lost your free will, how do you say you want to be released?
I mean, even I might like a trial period (though I'm not saying how long!

I'm just a 'girl' who wants to become a fembot whats wrong with that?
- Brianna 1365 Gamma
- Banned
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 2:12 pm
- Location: USA
- Stephaniebot
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 12:13 pm
- Technosexuality: Transformation
- Identification: Android
- Gender: Transgendered
- Location: Huddersfield
- x 2
- Contact:
Given that this robot suit has full control over free will then I'm assuming some sort of interfacing with the human wearer's mind would have to come as part of the deal. So the safe word thing should be feasible I guess?
Yes, I would assume that as long as its only a suit you would need to be able to do 'toilet duties' at some point, though catheter bags could be one way round that problem, short term at least.
But yes, given the human requirement for toilet functions it would be a bit of a shame if you had to strip right down every few hours, and therefore disconnect from your robot programming. I would think you might get placement awareness problems with that if you were say nowhere near where you were the last time you were in human mode. Be a lot easier if the robot suit could override such functions lol!
Yes, I would assume that as long as its only a suit you would need to be able to do 'toilet duties' at some point, though catheter bags could be one way round that problem, short term at least.
But yes, given the human requirement for toilet functions it would be a bit of a shame if you had to strip right down every few hours, and therefore disconnect from your robot programming. I would think you might get placement awareness problems with that if you were say nowhere near where you were the last time you were in human mode. Be a lot easier if the robot suit could override such functions lol!
I'm just a 'girl' who wants to become a fembot whats wrong with that?
- Remy
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:25 pm
- Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
- Identification: Human
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sandstone, MN
- Contact:
*grabs the remote control* Go ahead and put it on! X3Stephaniebot wrote:Well as someone with no family, no SO, and few friends I am lacking for a few of those options.
But lets be honest, if that sort of robot suit existed I wouldnt care who controlled me as long as they didnt take it off me again!
If it is possible for man to love machine, is there any way for the machine to love him back? I'd like to think so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests