Would you marry me?

Found an interesting gallery online or added some new images to FembotWiki? Post photo-manipulations, artwork, or other visual media here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Deep Blue
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
x 1
Contact:

Would you marry me?

Post by Deep Blue » Sun May 04, 2008 1:52 am

Image

User avatar
body
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 11:15 pm
x 4
x 5
Contact:

Unfortunately

Post by body » Sun May 04, 2008 5:38 am

Unfortunately I think that you had better polish a skill a little more.

A look is not so good.
The processing only for cut & paste.

You had better watch more an image of movies and the television.
:|

User avatar
Deep Blue
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
x 1
Contact:

Re: Unfortunately

Post by Deep Blue » Sun May 04, 2008 2:49 pm

body wrote:Unfortunately I think that you had better polish a skill a little more.

A look is not so good.
The processing only for cut & paste.

You had better watch more an image of movies and the television.
:|
How about this?

[IMAGE REMOVED]

User avatar
body
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 11:15 pm
x 4
x 5
Contact:

Post by body » Sun May 04, 2008 4:53 pm

How about this?

[IMAGE REMOVED]

User avatar
Deep Blue
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
x 1
Contact:

Post by Deep Blue » Sun May 04, 2008 10:01 pm

body wrote:How about this?

[IMAGE REMOVED]
You are the hero!

User avatar
Chen
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 6:03 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Android
Gender: Male
Location: Sweet potato Island in East Asia
x 5
x 24
Contact:

Post by Chen » Mon May 05, 2008 10:35 am

Well,body had been famous from the era of FAC,he is really a master :shock:

User avatar
Deep Blue
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
x 1
Contact:

Post by Deep Blue » Mon May 05, 2008 1:27 pm

I also would like to ask Mr.body that what can I do better on these photos?

[IMAGE REMOVED]

[IMAGE REMOVED]

User avatar
body
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 11:15 pm
x 4
x 5
Contact:

Post by body » Mon May 05, 2008 6:55 pm

paint with thickness of the skin & mechanical parts.
put a shadow.
retouch the desolate part.

Thickness does not appear by the cut & paste.
There is not the object without thickness & depth

User avatar
Deep Blue
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
x 1
Contact:

Post by Deep Blue » Fri May 09, 2008 2:57 am

-empty-
Last edited by Deep Blue on Fri May 09, 2008 3:28 am, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Deep Blue
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
x 1
Contact:

Post by Deep Blue » Fri May 09, 2008 3:25 am

Just like this?

[IMAGE REMOVED]

User avatar
body
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 11:15 pm
x 4
x 5
Contact:

Post by body » Sat May 10, 2008 5:40 am

I think that improved considerably
You should fix it , too blight and the rough part

Just like this
[IMAGE REMOVED]

droidlvr
Banned
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 5:40 pm
x 2

Post by droidlvr » Sat May 10, 2008 6:36 am

Kinda like that view angle. :)

User avatar
Deep Blue
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
x 1
Contact:

Post by Deep Blue » Sun May 11, 2008 1:38 am

[IMAGE REMOVED]

rabiator
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:51 am
Location: ??
Contact:

Post by rabiator » Sun May 11, 2008 8:59 am

Hi Blue,

I support body's suggestions, and I think your image from May 11, 2008 9:38 am is way better than your first one in this thread. So thickness of the ripped open skin and some shadows definitely work :)

One more thing that might improve your work further:
Think about the "anatomy" of your bots. Any exposed stuff should be in that place for a reason.

A good example is your image from May 04, 2008 10:49 pm with the open knee. The metal skeleton is close to the surface as in a human, so if you pat her on the knee you would get a realistic impression of "bones" under the skin.
Except for the matter of skin thickness (where I think body improved upon) this is a very good manip.

Not quite as good in this regard:
The image from May 11. I praised it above for the improved 3D aspects, but I think the metal pipe (is it the "bone"?) should be either thicker or deeper inside the leg. As it is, the leg would be somewhat asymmetrical, with lots of padding needed on the other side of the metal pipe to get to the full diameter of the leg.

User avatar
Deep Blue
Posts: 480
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:11 pm
x 1
Contact:

Post by Deep Blue » Sun May 11, 2008 10:06 am

rabiator wrote:Hi Blue,

I support body's suggestions, and I think your image from May 11, 2008 9:38 am is way better than your first one in this thread. So thickness of the ripped open skin and some shadows definitely work :)

One more thing that might improve your work further:
Think about the "anatomy" of your bots. Any exposed stuff should be in that place for a reason.

A good example is your image from May 04, 2008 10:49 pm with the open knee. The metal skeleton is close to the surface as in a human, so if you pat her on the knee you would get a realistic impression of "bones" under the skin.
Except for the matter of skin thickness (where I think body improved upon) this is a very good manip.

Not quite as good in this regard:
The image from May 11. I praised it above for the improved 3D aspects, but I think the metal pipe (is it the "bone"?) should be either thicker or deeper inside the leg. As it is, the leg would be somewhat asymmetrical, with lots of padding needed on the other side of the metal pipe to get to the full diameter of the leg.
First thanks for watching my manip, because of this thread, I think that I am just at the beginning of fembot photo manipulating. Before this thread, my photos are looked like child's play.

The open knee one shocked me and made me understand that what is thickness, it pushed me to learn more about manip. The "metal pipe" one is the thing I learned. And the metal was really stand for bone, I tried to made more shadow in order to made it deeper. Maybe it can deeper as it was a thigh. :wink:

Post Reply
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests