Re: Quasi-scientific poll

Miss Pris · Post by **Miss Pris** » Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:58 pm

Why did you take the gender question out of the poll? (I found the contrast very interesting.)

Miss Pris · Post by **Miss Pris** » Sun Nov 06, 2016 1:15 pm

Hmm... I must be. I have a graph from - what I thought was the original poll - that shows three bars for males interested in sex with built machines, transforming someone into, and becoming one themselves, and then three more bars for females with the same. I must be hallucinating that it came from this poll.

Miss Pris · Post by **Miss Pris** » Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:43 pm

That must be it. That's a shame, as it was interesting to see the gender and interest range and how these factors were associated. I'd create one, but I don't want to start/add to any weird gender drama that particular banned user might left behind.

darkbutflashy · Post by **darkbutflashy** » Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:42 am

I think it's inevitable but I promise not to be part of it again.

Miss Pris · Post by **Miss Pris** » Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:22 pm

Thanks

I would, but my data acquisition permissions for my project have or are about to expire, and by the time I got the poll together I wouldn't be able to use it. I could do it for my own curiosity, but if anything interesting came out of it, it would drive me crazy that I couldn't use it. That sounds like some good research for a future article though, the next time I put in for permissions.