-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by dale coba » Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:11 am
Historically, the very first innovator for big projects spends much effort, but others may take advantage of the ground-breaking work. Perhaps the competition will look like the mp3 player, cell phone & tablet battles of the 2000s? or perhaps Google has the patents to stay ahead, ones which fundamentally matter; and the finances to see them through a slow adoption or successful competition.
I think we've seen the primary motivators behind so much progress comes from the military, or industry looking to hire fewer employees. Is there the sure money behind humanoid bots that can socially pass for human? Is there a Hugh Hefner, or a Bob Guccionne figure behind the sexualizing breakthrough. Maybe it's all after-market, warranty-voiding modifications that bring into being this first model-that-passes-for-human? Once society accepts the existence, Google can unveil that they've had a better model, factory sexualized, just waiting to swoop back and crush the market share of the first public innovator.
Google's so big, I wonder if any precedent even exists in home electronics. Maybe Google just builds and starts selling its own (properly licensed) Buffybot, Lucy Liu-bot, or Marilyn Monrobot, with any fear of backlash by Fundamentalists, moralists, and other objectioneers.
- Dale Coba