"The Amanda Show"

ehy · Post by **ehy** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:02 am

I don't think anyone's accusing you of being a pedophile so much as being concerned about giving the authorities an excuse to go nuts on anyone who's ever visited this site. Think about what could happen if the right combination of circumstances got you arrested because you "visited a fetish website that includes pictures of underage girls?" Because that's literally what this would be, and there are lots of Americans who'd condemn you, me, or the moderators instantly without any more information than that. It sounds a lot worse than it is, and I can't blame people for being scared of the possible consequences.

You're not evil for wanting to see it. It's just risky, given the legal climate in the US now.

kb7rky · Post by **kb7rky** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:40 am

Wasn't this topic discussed once or twice already?

Doug

Baron · Post by **Baron** » Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:13 pm

kb7rky wrote:Wasn't this topic discussed once or twice already?

Doug

Yeah, it was.
In connection with somebody trying to defend "Small Wonder" as a legitimate ASFR contender, as I recall.

As to the "P" connotation - seems to me it's still waddling and quacking......

Moxon · Post by **Moxon** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:06 pm

robotman wrote:

I also don't think the future of ASFR is in any danger if we stick to adult representations of fembots. I knew I had this fetish long before I found other people who felt likewise on the internet.

I did too, but would like to add that I had the fetish long before I was 18 as well, but was still viewing (but not interacting with members of) the ASFR community. We should keep in mind that there may be lurkers out there, as I was once, many years ago, who are under 18, or even 15. Just a reality check, for whatever it's worth. But sexual depictions of minors is not only illegal and immoral, but just plain weird and I would think and hope that 99.9% of the members of this board would agree with that statement. For my part, I was glad to have an outlet for my interest in ASFR during puberty and can state that having said place on the web, without a shadow of a doubt, has paved the way for my ability to have normal, healthy relationships with women in my adulthood, and for that, I extend my deepest thanks to all of you, old and new members alike. So a lack of adolescent fembots never was a "make or break" issue to me in my youth (as teenage boys will always lust after older women) and I don't see why it would be an issue today. No one is being accused of being a pedophile by me, nor am I condoning it, but we also have to realize that a younger fembot may be appealing (in a completely legal way) to the teenagers that we most certainly have lurking this board, as long as they are not portrayed in an amoral or sexual fashion. However, I can see the viewpoint as well that you can't ignore the "S" in ASFR (although I personally would not apply it to a 16-yr.-old), and if that's the case, then I'm all for pulling the pics of the young'uns off the site; but that's up to the admins, not me. That's just my tiny little piece of internet 2 cents. Please don't flame me 'cause I think all you guys are pretty cool.

Moxon · Post by **Moxon** » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:09 pm

Please don't flame me 'cause I think all you guys are pretty cool

Oops! Please excuse the gender bias, the girls here are cool too.

Stephaniebot · Post by **Stephaniebot** » Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:59 am

It would be interesting to know how much Miss Bynes had to be convinced to act like a robot or whether the idea actually did appeal to her,or indeed was her own idea.Maybe she will be a member of this site in a few years time?