Washington Post mocks a (real) anti-sex-robot campaing

Svengli · Post by **Svengli** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:33 pm

"Having sex with robots is really, really bad, Campaign Against Sex Robots says"

Well, I think we probably saw a campaign like this coming so it's good that the WAPO both reports in a philosophy professor's anti-sex-robot campaign and sneers derisively at it.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morn ... bots-says/

darkbutflashy · Post by **darkbutflashy** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 4:40 pm

Speaking of the 50ies:

Brought to you by the Space Pope:

--NightBattery-- · Post by **--NightBattery--** » Tue Sep 15, 2015 4:41 pm

damn it, i was gonna post that.

Miss Pris · Post by **Miss Pris** » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:21 am

Sheesh... alright, let's DO talk about ethics and power inequalities for a minute; how many women and children will robot sex workers save from forced sex work, slavery, and human trafficking? We're probably not going to have "feeling" AI with emotion-based preferences by 2050, so robot "feelings" and object-oriented ontology arguments are still kind of moot. Let's worry about their feelings when they have them - in the meantime robot sex workers could revolutionize a business that's much too comfortable with human pain.

dale coba · Post by **dale coba** » Fri Sep 18, 2015 5:37 pm

The demand for human sex workers will drastically decrease.
The mean streets are gonna get harder to survive.

Perhaps the newly-impoverished sex workers should be given robots to pimp,
and be allowed to keep the money paid for the robots' services.

- Dale Coba

Washington Post mocks a (real) anti-sex-robot campaing

Washington Post mocks a (real) anti-sex-robot campaing

Re: Washington Post mocks a (real) anti-sex-robot campaing

Re: Washington Post mocks a (real) anti-sex-robot campaing

Re: Washington Post mocks a (real) anti-sex-robot campaing

Re: Washington Post mocks a (real) anti-sex-robot campaing