exposed circuits

[PHILBOT88]

Hi.
i am just wondering wot anyone thinks to seeing exposed circuitry on an android.
if lets say u were watching a film etc and they were humam looking robots in it a la westworld when either the android gets damaged and needing repair or malfunctions were both cases the android is laying on a work table with his or her circuitry exposed . How does that make u feel. Im i being weird in that i fined it abit of a turn on more so with the female android.

[dale coba]

PHILBOT88,
Around here you are absolutely right to feel that way. You see her internal circuits, and realize she has no room inside for fleshy human organs. That is perhaps the simplest and most definitive proof that she is an object; the very reason for her existence is to be objectified.



Once you see her revealed in all her gorgeous inhumanity, you have a green light. She is yours for the taking. Modify her, protect her, ride her hard in the sack - there is no conventional personhood, no Self who deserves and demands the respect and rights of self-determination which should be afforded to every woman (no matter how much her great gorgeousness cries out to be used as a sexual object).

Your reaction only makes sense.

- Dale Coba

[PHILBOT88]

Thxs guys [
to me the best part is sort of knowing she.s an android but carnt realy tell up until she gets damaged or malfunctions then seeing her exposed circuirty do u then no shes realy a life like machine show her inner circuits and wiring. .
the part in westworld at the end were he thinks he.s saving the girl up until ye gives her water were she sparks and buzzes do u then get shes an android. That is the thing that i enjoy the not knowing bit then fining out shes an android ..i wish there would b more films tv series like that.

[liliwinnt6]

When a piece of circuitry is exposed to me, the conflict of her being human or inhuman makes me hard.
Different body positions of exposure have different bonus, eg: lower abdomen, below one of a breast, center upper chest above breasts and so on.

[liliwinnt6]

I agree liliwinnt!

Yea, not only her circuitry, but also anything else robotic. By the way human imagination is infinite, you may think anything in order to turn you on!

[Jazzfan]

Hell yeah! Exposed circuitry and I don't know about you guys but the bent over at the waist, open eyed shut, mouth slightly open is the shiiiit. Specially with a very stepfordian floral dress and heels.

I think Dale will agree with me on the attire.

Also stiff legs (at the knee) when someone picks it up is awesome somehow.

Lets be weird!

[Deep Blue]

When a piece of circuitry is exposed to me, the conflict of her being human or inhuman makes me hard.
Different body positions of exposure have different bonus, eg: lower abdomen, below one of a breast, center upper chest above breasts and so on.

Also the arms, legs or even the crotch. It just exposed in the dress when she sit down. It is sexiest way.

[Miss Pris]

So I like exposed circuitry, but on a sentient or semi-sentient robot (or better yet, a cyborg!) For me it’s not about objectification (which, as Dale mentioned, applies best for an insentient, true object), but about the otherness and the liminality — that (almost) violation of the boundaries between (wo)man and machine.

Self repair is especially hot!

[darkbutflashy]

I'm totally d'accord with Miss Pris which is so unique I'd have to mention it here.

Then again: exposed circuits are fine but in a real robot or cyborg, circuits are filling up only a small part of the frame. Most of it is filled with motors and the power cells. That emphasis on circuits make a fembot/cyborg always look like a reminiscence of the bionic woman fembots; but there it was to make them look distinct from Jaime, who only had small circuit implants.

So be different: expose general machinery, not just circuits.

[dale coba]

So I like exposed circuitry, but on a sentient or semi-sentient robot (or better yet, a cyborg!) For me it’s not about objectification (which, as Dale mentioned, applies best for an insentient, true object), but about the otherness and the liminality — that (almost) violation of the boundaries between (wo)man and machine.

Self repair is especially hot!

1) The Other demonstrates her vulnerability with exposure.
She demonstrates trust, or hesitance; or if enough of her brain is automated, she may show an inhuman indifference to personal boundaries and exposing herself.

2) Who are we, or the human or the robot, to say what is or isn't "appropriate" in that moment?
There are no familiar, established, commonly recognized boundaries.
Neither Emily Post nor Dr. Ruth drew up an etiquette guide for this encounter.

There are so many permutations and questions:
- Will she calculate that you have already revealed your attraction, by the way you look upon her body where her technology begins and the illusion of her humanity ends? If so, will your interest be welcomed, or rebuffed?
- Or does the cyborg mean no significance in her display of nonchalant inhumanity?
- If she asks you to reach inside and make a repair, would she prefer or not to know how erotic you find her circuitry? (not a good line to use on Jamie Sommers).

The moment defies conventional analysis; therefore, every attempt to anticipate her response is only a guess, where you may betray yourself (a guess reflecting either what she intends to show, or how much you wish to see it). Every attempt is divine her interest is a simple guess, so all failures to analyze are easily excused.

How foolish would it be, not to risk rejection?
Their potential knows no upside limit.

- Dale Coba