My ideal fembot......part 2.....apperance

General chat about fembots, technosexual culture or any other ASFR related topics that do not fit into the other categories below.
Post Reply

The following best describes my ideal fembot's appearance

Totally lifelike
43
52%
Metallic
4
5%
Fleshtone with noticeable seams/panels
15
18%
Plastic-like (Mannequinn)
2
2%
Noticeably fake (Realdoll-like)
5
6%
Flesh/Metallic combo
14
17%
 
Total votes: 83

phantom-x
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 9:24 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

My ideal fembot......part 2.....apperance

Post by phantom-x » Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:12 pm

Just another topic to get the gears going......as far as i know this one has never come up.....just for the record i'll say Realdoll-like, but i'm very interested to see where this one goes folks!

rs5420
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:34 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
x 49
x 4
Contact:

Post by rs5420 » Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:50 pm

Lifelike to what we could see when she wear clothes, but definitively apparent that she's a robot when she don't wear anything (seams at upper arms and legs, artifical looking pussy, and evident servicing abdominal access hatch).

ehy
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 3:41 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Contact:

Post by ehy » Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:30 pm

Any of those except the metallics, for me.

I don't know why I don't care for metal, but, I don't.

User avatar
slvsara
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 2:51 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Transgendered
Contact:

Post by slvsara » Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:50 am

Well, it really depends a whole lot on my mood at the moment.
Tho on the whole, I'd have to join EHY and Kishin in my general
lack of attraction to the purely metallic look. Tho' there have been
a few times.....

I guess my main desires (not in any order) focus on :

1) The "Soccer Mom" style of fembot. Lifelike in most every way
and programmed to act and believe she is human. Till told to
enter robotic mode when desired, that is. :wink:

2) The Real Doll latex look. Programmed to know totally that she is
a device and core algorithms which give positive feedback based
on her "pride" at being a device.

Hmmm...It seems that my appearance preferences are highly
influenced by behavioural aspects too..... :roll: Sorry if I slipped
off topic.

I have also had some nice thoughts involving the mannequinn
look as seen in a Bjork video ("All Is Love" as I recall the title).
Obediantly,
sara

"The perversity of technosexuals is ornate and elaborate."

cod386
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 1:06 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Post by cod386 » Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:51 pm

Definately Realdoll like !
Lifelike might be ok if there are still subtle differences or panels.
Third place would be plastic-like and then metalic.
Flesh/metalic combo is worst for me.

User avatar
Stephaniebot
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 12:13 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Android
Gender: Transgendered
Location: Huddersfield
x 2
Contact:

Post by Stephaniebot » Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:59 pm

I can understand the logic of totally lifelike getting a lot of votes, but to me there just has to be that 'little something' that defines her as non human in status. Discreet panels would be 1 way round that, seams or maybe a manufacturers mark would be others. The mark could be say above the navel or on the chest where it only shows when desired.
I suppose in many ways a very advanced real doll type android would be a very good option.
I can equally understand fully why the metallic look isnt popular, its just too non human for most peoples tastes, in terms of contact of any kind with a robot. Me, I do love the metallic look a la Maria but I guess thats just my sort of desire.
Something reasonably lifelike, but clearly not human would be favourite way to go.
I'm just a 'girl' who wants to become a fembot whats wrong with that?

cod386
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 1:06 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Post by cod386 » Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:56 pm

I think that the metal is not so popular because of the common perception of metals: cold, hard and sharp.

1001011001
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 6:55 pm
Contact:

Post by 1001011001 » Tue Nov 22, 2005 4:32 pm

I prefer lifelike looks and mechanical movements.

User avatar
code_author
Posts: 339
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 8:41 pm
Contact:

The problem with these polls...

Post by code_author » Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:52 pm

The problem I have with these polls is that they don't let you check more than one answer. I like life-like, but I also like metalic, partial metalic, life-like with seams metalic with seams, etc... Hell I like most fembots, that's why I'm here.

Code

User avatar
GZ02
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 12:43 pm
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Contact:

Post by GZ02 » Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:21 pm

I'll agree with Phantom, I'd like my fembot to look clearly artificial...and eerily sexy...

User avatar
Brytestar
Posts: 1080
Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 11:38 pm
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Metro Detroit
x 1
x 2
Contact:

Post by Brytestar » Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:59 pm

I'd favor the totally lifelike ones myself.

User avatar
M4R1A
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:02 am
Location: Antarctica
x 1
Contact:

Post by M4R1A » Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:12 am

I'd imagine more of a flesh/fiberglass or flesh/abs plastic kind of thing, but that option wasn't avalible. =\ Metal's so outdated to me.

User avatar
A.N.N.
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 4:24 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by A.N.N. » Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:43 pm

I totally agree with slvsara. It all depends on my mood. I like the way metal looks, but it's really not practical for most intended uses. The realisitc look is the one I think I'd prefer for most cases, and so I voted that way.

But then again, maybe you could have a couple fembots. One for daily companionship, and a sporty model (probably the plastic looking one) for just robotic sex!
A.N.N.

123bot
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:59 pm
x 4
x 9
Contact:

Post by 123bot » Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:21 pm

If it's metallic, it has to be "à la Phantasy Star", it's turn on for me. I like them all but i choosed flesh/metal combo.

Svengli
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:47 pm
x 27
x 6
Contact:

Post by Svengli » Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:05 am

I prefer totally life-like, except perhaps some kind of tatoo or very subtle give-away.

It would be good to have movements and behavior give away her robot quality but in a way that is subtle. Moving with extreme grace but in a somewhat stereotypical way - moving a ballerina all the time.

Also, she would have super-model looks and a charming emotional affect, basically qualities that would make people ask "how the heck did she get here?"

This is more or less the presentation of The Stepford Wives in the book version. Too pretty and poised to be real yet always leaving them guessing.

Best,

S

Ciepher
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:03 pm
Technosexuality: None of your business
Identification: Cyborg
Gender: Female
x 1
Contact:

Post by Ciepher » Mon Dec 12, 2005 5:46 pm

My ideal would have an appearance that is almost indistinguishable from a human except for a few tiny things. She'd have a few tiny seams where her panels open, hair that looks a bit artificial and maybe an unnatural eye colour. She might hold herself with a posture that is a bit too perfect or talk in a very formal-sounding voice without the usual slang. She may seem a little oblivious to organic things like emotion, faith and pain.

I also go for almost a cyborg look with robotic limbs on an otherwise human-like body.

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 3:54 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Android
Gender: Female
Location: GPS signal lost
x 1
Contact:

Post by Bart » Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:18 pm

I used to prefer 100% lifelike, but begin to really like the plastic/fibre/metal style like in All is full of love, I Robot (well...), Svedka ads... Building a lifelike robot would be veeery difficult but a plastic one - with wires and ventilation holes everywhere, a blue illuminated power button on her chest - is very imaginable to arrive in the near future, which already does it for me. I LOVE the screw-holes you see on Björk's chest in AIFOL.. geez everytime I see a screwdriver, it reminds me of her :twisted:
This post was generated by automated means and is therefore valid without a signature.

Kube²
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:38 pm
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: France
x 8
x 60
Contact:

Post by Kube² » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:24 pm

My ideal fembot looks 100% real
But i like when skin is really realistic but a little "too" perfect to be true....
Perfectly regular with a very litle plastic aspect but only if you look a the skin from very near.

User avatar
M4R1A
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:02 am
Location: Antarctica
x 1
Contact:

Post by M4R1A » Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:09 pm

123bot wrote:If it's metallic, it has to be "à la Phantasy Star", it's turn on for me. I like them all but i choosed flesh/metal combo.
Heh, Phantasy Star Androids = <3
I agree with that. It just seems to defeat the purpose of being a robot if their entirety looks too human.

Post Reply
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests