New find: TeknoLust

Share or request information and reviews on various forms of fembot media.
(Please use the search option before requesting a review as it may have been covered in the past)
Post Reply
loki4213
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 2:47 pm
Contact:

New find: TeknoLust

Post by loki4213 » Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:20 pm


User avatar
blkwdo
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 7:34 pm
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Michigan, USA
x 20
x 4
Contact:

Post by blkwdo » Wed Aug 20, 2003 5:27 pm

Friendly warning:

I'm feeling sorry for anyone on a dial-up connection trying to access this site. Flash intensive and slow loading...be prepared to wait.

:(

PirateStoat
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by PirateStoat » Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:32 pm

I've seen this movie, last year, at the Toronto International Film Festival

The artificial females certainly act inhuman, but I'm not sure 'robotic' is quite the way to describe it. They _do_ act largely unemotionally, and they have a nice 'pause for calculation - deliberate action' thing going.

No circuitry anywhere, though.

User avatar
kb7rky
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 11:38 am
Location: Lewiston, Idaho
Contact:

Post by kb7rky » Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:47 am

So, it other words, just your typical porno B-flick hack job

Must...resist...urge...to...buy...bad...porno...flick...must...resist...

Okay, all gone now.

(putting money back in wallet)
C'mon over & check out my other webpage:

The First Church Of Buster

And, the homepage:

Mythbusters Fan Club.com

PirateStoat
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by PirateStoat » Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:39 pm

Actually, it's not a porno. It's an art film.

Go figure.

User avatar
Trace Venom
Posts: 334
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 7:21 pm
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Android
Gender: Male
Location: Shangri-la dee da
x 18
x 2
Contact:

Yes it is...

Post by Trace Venom » Fri Sep 05, 2003 6:09 pm

I did read about it, and it has the woman who played the sexy-in-a-weird-way tribal dictator in "The Beach", and since recognizing her I figured it would be some small budget indy sci-fi meditation on humanity.

User avatar
kb7rky
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 11:38 am
Location: Lewiston, Idaho
Contact:

Post by kb7rky » Fri Sep 05, 2003 6:43 pm

PirateStoat wrote:Actually, it's not a porno. It's an art film.

Go figure.
At the risk of igniting a flame war:

So, what's the difference?

:P
C'mon over & check out my other webpage:

The First Church Of Buster

And, the homepage:

Mythbusters Fan Club.com

PirateStoat
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by PirateStoat » Sat Sep 06, 2003 8:40 am

In porn, you're supposed to be thrilled by the size of the actor's 'equipment'

In art film, you're supposed to be thrilled by the size of the director's brain (or, possibly, his ego)

User avatar
Trace Venom
Posts: 334
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 7:21 pm
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Android
Gender: Male
Location: Shangri-la dee da
x 18
x 2
Contact:

Heh...

Post by Trace Venom » Sat Sep 06, 2003 10:49 am

8) Touche

User avatar
kb7rky
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 11:38 am
Location: Lewiston, Idaho
Contact:

Post by kb7rky » Sat Sep 06, 2003 6:41 pm

Ah...

Okay, this topic is officially dead...next?
C'mon over & check out my other webpage:

The First Church Of Buster

And, the homepage:

Mythbusters Fan Club.com

handle
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:34 am
Contact:

Post by handle » Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:16 pm

PirateStoat wrote:In porn, you're supposed to be thrilled by the size of the actor's 'equipment'

In art film, you're supposed to be thrilled by the size of the director's brain (or, possibly, his ego)
Funny. In Singapore, our idea of adult films is usually classified Restricted (Artistic) and shown to only people above 21 years of age. Covers all the bases, no? :D

Post Reply
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 30 guests