3D Images
- dale coba
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 9:05 pm
- Technosexuality: Transformation
- Identification: Human
- Gender: Male
- Location: Philadelphia
- x 12
- x 13
Re: 3D Images
It seems straight-forward to me: no single photograph can provide a three-D image, without polarized or colored glasses to provide different information to each eye. The two images of a stereoscope are not alike, and provide more information than one can. Lose that information, lose the dimension.
We would have seen such miraculous images in galleries and homes for decades, since the day after the method was invented. Given the history of photography, and the great popularity stereoscopes enjoyed, I'm sure many inventors struggled in vain with the possibilities. The 3-d, red-blue movie glasses was the best they could manage. You can make a still picture for red-blue or polarized glasses, but it's a headache inducing nightmare seen without them.
Someone educate me otherwise; but I say, no.
- Dale Coba
We would have seen such miraculous images in galleries and homes for decades, since the day after the method was invented. Given the history of photography, and the great popularity stereoscopes enjoyed, I'm sure many inventors struggled in vain with the possibilities. The 3-d, red-blue movie glasses was the best they could manage. You can make a still picture for red-blue or polarized glasses, but it's a headache inducing nightmare seen without them.
Someone educate me otherwise; but I say, no.
- Dale Coba
: [ ] = [ ... ... ]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests