TrueCompanion: The first-ever sex robot?

Share or request information and reviews on various forms of fembot media.
(Please use the search option before requesting a review as it may have been covered in the past)
Post Reply
User avatar
PsychoKirby
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:26 am
Contact:

Post by PsychoKirby » Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:53 am

So it seems. Good to know. Anybody know if there'll be some kind of live stream or something?
<b><i>"To you, a robot is a robot. Gears and metal; electricity and positrons. Mind and iron! Human-made! If necessary, human-destroyed! But you haven't worked with them, so you don't know them. They're a cleaner, better breed than we are."</i></b>

User avatar
fnord
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:40 am
Technosexuality: None of your business
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Betty White for President!
Contact:

Post by fnord » Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:45 pm

hi all


Some thoughts are bumping around in my head. Wicked Productions the folks that brought us 2040 have teamed up with Realdoll to produce licensed
Realdolls of some porn actresses http://www.dollforum.com/modules.php?na ... 709#308194 has a discussion and pics of two of the dolls Jessica Drake and Electra Blue both of them were apparently in the film 2040.

http://coverdoll.com/drupal/?q=node/792 has the same pic and a vid of the dolls by the creator of Realdoll.

I know I am stepping out on a limb here with my correlation, as all of this seems very hush hush. But could they be related in some way to true companions?
"I have seen the fnords"

User avatar
fnord
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:40 am
Technosexuality: None of your business
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Betty White for President!
Contact:

Post by fnord » Fri Jan 08, 2010 12:47 pm

http://ourdollcommunity.com/gallery/dis ... =79&pos=14


well.....................here IT is .............look very poor I'm reminded of Joan Rivers in spaceballs some how? so far disappointed
"I have seen the fnords"

Borias
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:01 pm
Contact:

Post by Borias » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:25 pm

.
Last edited by Borias on Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
PsychoKirby
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:26 am
Contact:

Post by PsychoKirby » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:58 pm

That's it? Seems all my excitement was in vain. :(

In a related note, there's a sort of joint-like hole where her neck should be, which is fairly common in some Disney animatronic. I assume her head can move, for some reason.
<b><i>"To you, a robot is a robot. Gears and metal; electricity and positrons. Mind and iron! Human-made! If necessary, human-destroyed! But you haven't worked with them, so you don't know them. They're a cleaner, better breed than we are."</i></b>

Svengli
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:47 pm
x 27
x 6
Contact:

Post by Svengli » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:38 pm

Yeah,

The doll looks like a generic porn actress. News for some people: porn actresses aren't chosen 'cause they have the look men crave for a sex partner. Porn actresses are chosen 'cause they are willing to make porn movies. Future doll makers, please look to the Hollywood (non-porn) stars for your future dolls.

Still, the question of realcompanion isn't appearance but functions. For the right price, it seems there are superlative looking dolls and realCompanion could always be reskinned or have a new model created.

She was billed as a robot. What does she do?

User avatar
fnord
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:40 am
Technosexuality: None of your business
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Betty White for President!
Contact:

Post by fnord » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:38 pm

according to posts about AVI "It" is to be fired up on Sat. Wonder what 8 track they might use ...something from the Be Gees is my guess...lol. So no idea what actions it will or won't be capable of. Or price !
"I have seen the fnords"

handle
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:34 am
Contact:

Post by handle » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:57 am

I'm a little more concerned about the visible seam on the doll - if it's merely a prototype and this will be engineered out of sight in the final model this is irrelevant, but sex is a messy and fluid-intensive sort of fun, and I don't think it would be a good idea to have the innards of the doll putting out (or worse, admitting) any fluids. could be a shock hazard at the right voltage.

User avatar
fnord
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:40 am
Technosexuality: None of your business
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Betty White for President!
Contact:

Post by fnord » Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:24 pm

"I have seen the fnords"

loki4213
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 2:47 pm
Contact:

looks like

Post by loki4213 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:06 pm

It sort of looks like Catherine Tate with blonde hair.

User avatar
beatnik100
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 12:46 am
Location: USA
x 2
x 1
Contact:

Post by beatnik100 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:35 pm


User avatar
Stephaniebot
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 12:13 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Android
Gender: Transgendered
Location: Huddersfield
x 2
Contact:

Re: looks like

Post by Stephaniebot » Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:29 am

loki4213 wrote:It sort of looks like Catherine Tate with blonde hair.


Yes, I can definitely see that too.
I'm just a 'girl' who wants to become a fembot whats wrong with that?

minkwheel
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 5:40 pm
x 1
Contact:

Post by minkwheel » Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:45 am

Perhaps we should ask Catherine if she is "BOVERED" by it.
...From my HEART and from my HAND
WHY don't people understand my intentions?

rabiator
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:51 am
Location: ??
Contact:

A hoax or even fraud?

Post by rabiator » Sun Jan 10, 2010 7:45 am

The creators of Roxxxy claim she can do lots of things up to carrying a conversation, but in the videos she is only sitting there. Might be a custom Realdoll without anything else for all we know.

So I wouldn't pay any money for it until there is a more meaningful demonstration.

minkwheel
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 5:40 pm
x 1
Contact:

Post by minkwheel » Sun Jan 10, 2010 4:51 pm

I'm actually WAY more impressed by AIKO and how far SHE'S gone in such a short time..... If Aiko's creator had unlimited money and assistants, imagine what could be accomplished....I actually would like to see him hired by HONDA to work on HRP-4C.....SHE'S GOING TO NEED TO DO MORE THAN WINK AND LOOK SURPRISED in the future.
...From my HEART and from my HAND
WHY don't people understand my intentions?

User avatar
Lithorien
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:15 pm
Technosexuality: None of your business
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Virginia
x 5
x 4
Contact:

Post by Lithorien » Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:22 pm

If she could actually carry a conversation, it'd be pretty cool. :)

As it is, I wish they were doing beta testing. I'd volunteer. :)

User avatar
Keizo
Posts: 769
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 11:42 am
Location: The Dark Side
Contact:

Post by Keizo » Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:43 pm

I doubt that she can carry on a conversation. From the video demonstration, it seems as if all her responses were pre-recorded and only to the physical stimulation. The Actroid could reply to 4,000 questions in four languages and from various verbal dialects, but that's also ALL pre-recorded. The only interactive real-time advancement I have seen is with Le Trung and Aiko. They really need to consider contacting him since he has done more on his own than that entire team of scientists working all those years. And they really should just make a mold of a better face from a hot stripper or even off of a mannequin! I absolutely agree that porn stars are not the ideal look most men truly want as opposed to, say... a swimsuit model. Just my two cents.

petey
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 9:03 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Midwest USA
x 5
x 68
Contact:

Post by petey » Thu Jan 14, 2010 12:44 am

I think this is the place for it. This little rubber lump* made the rounds of the late night talk show monologues. Including The Colbert Report. Clip is probably U.S. only.

*- I'm certain this will be a term of endearment in 50 years.

User avatar
PsychoKirby
Posts: 157
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:26 am
Contact:

Post by PsychoKirby » Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:02 am

Heh. Didn't Colbert interview David Levy a while back, actually?
<b><i>"To you, a robot is a robot. Gears and metal; electricity and positrons. Mind and iron! Human-made! If necessary, human-destroyed! But you haven't worked with them, so you don't know them. They're a cleaner, better breed than we are."</i></b>

jakeCTom
Posts: 237
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:13 pm
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Contact:

Post by jakeCTom » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:14 pm


User avatar
Gorgo
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 4:06 am
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Fort Erie, Ontario
x 63
x 10
Contact:

Post by Gorgo » Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:30 pm

Robotman wrote:Holy fuck, that thing gets uglier every time I see it.
Image
Agreed. :shock:
Canadian lighthouse to U.S. warship approaching it: This is a lighthouse; your call.

User avatar
Keizo
Posts: 769
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 11:42 am
Location: The Dark Side
Contact:

Post by Keizo » Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:24 pm

NO, NO, NO!!! Please stop giving this any press! It makes all of us look bad. All non fembot fetishists will look at this and associate it with us and it doesn't represent us at all. It doesn't even compare to a realdoll in looks and makes us all look like desperate losers. Aiko can see and move and do so much more and her responses aren't pre-recorded. The Actroid has more pre-recorded responses than this thing and can actually move! Make it stop :!:
:evil:

User avatar
mysticblueca
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 10:46 pm
Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: Kingston, ON
Contact:

Post by mysticblueca » Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:09 pm

ARGH! The Nightmares have returned! Get it out of my head, get it out!!!!!

I'm with Keizo let it DIE!! Hopefully it will go away.

User avatar
Stephaniebot
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 12:13 pm
Technosexuality: Transformation
Identification: Android
Gender: Transgendered
Location: Huddersfield
x 2
Contact:

Post by Stephaniebot » Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:48 am

Robotman wrote:I'm guessing the guy who made this monstrosity is sexually attracted to retarded men... because that "doll" looks like a retarded man. :P
Have you never seen Catherine Tate on the TV at all, because she looks exactly like her!
I'm just a 'girl' who wants to become a fembot whats wrong with that?

User avatar
DukeNukem 2417
Posts: 1197
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:26 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Location: somwhere on Planet Earth
x 3
x 30
Contact:

Post by DukeNukem 2417 » Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:20 am

Someone should take that ugly-ass thing behind a building and put it out of its misery. Any volunteers?
"No one steals our chicks.....and lives!"

Post Reply
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests