I thought it was a great vid. Thanks Galiana for helping me being able to watch it. Everything was spot on. My only thing that I personally would have liked was more malfunctioning. However, keep in mind everybody here really has different tastes that can be pretty different to a surprising degree. Good work.
Jake
Android Demo Video
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:13 pm
- Technosexuality: Built
- Identification: Human
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
- GalianaChance
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:39 am
- Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
- Identification: Android
- Gender: Female
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Thank you so much Jake! I'm glad we figured out a way for you to see it!
And "more malfunctioning" has been noted!
And "more malfunctioning" has been noted!
Galiana Chance: Professional phone sex operator with a theater & technical background, trying to improve my role play skills for technosexual callers.
Relevant blog posts: http://galianachance.net/blog/category/technosexual/
Relevant blog posts: http://galianachance.net/blog/category/technosexual/
- wjbaines
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 10:54 am
- Technosexuality: Built
- Identification: Human
- Gender: Male
- x 1
- Contact:
Just to follow up on the request for additional feedback...
I'm not really sure what to say, since 1.) the desires of the members of this forum are extremely heterogenous, and 2.) my own desires are hardly ever of one mind, themselves.
What could I usefully say?
Well, first of all, after reiterating the above -- that the group is far from arriving at a monolithic "ASFR" understanding of the fetish beyond general cues and triggers...
Probably the most important thing I can say is that our fetish has absolutely no set doctrine. This unusual fact is partly due to our humble beginnings (not to say humble current whereabouts) in which most all of us happily and for the best favor inclusivity in order to foster a broader base of contributing adherants.
Or perhaps, rather than saying we have no single doctrine, it would be more accurate to say that we have multiple doctrines. However, I don't think that they are competeing -- at least in terms of securing commerical fullfillment -- but complimentary. We are all trying to bring the fetish -- writ large -- into the "mainstream."
Try to imagine where we are coming from. Hundreds of people here, no doubt, with related interests, trying to advance our cause to the level enjoyed by, say, for example, the ball-gag enthusiasts. And catered to by only a tenth of a percent of the suppliers out there.
We are a tiny minority. So in my view, we tend to tread lightly and take what we can from wherever we can get it.
What we do now, what we ask for -- and what you provide -- at this fledgeling stage, will shape the direction of the fetish for possibly all time!
I'm not really sure what to say, since 1.) the desires of the members of this forum are extremely heterogenous, and 2.) my own desires are hardly ever of one mind, themselves.
What could I usefully say?
Well, first of all, after reiterating the above -- that the group is far from arriving at a monolithic "ASFR" understanding of the fetish beyond general cues and triggers...
Probably the most important thing I can say is that our fetish has absolutely no set doctrine. This unusual fact is partly due to our humble beginnings (not to say humble current whereabouts) in which most all of us happily and for the best favor inclusivity in order to foster a broader base of contributing adherants.
Or perhaps, rather than saying we have no single doctrine, it would be more accurate to say that we have multiple doctrines. However, I don't think that they are competeing -- at least in terms of securing commerical fullfillment -- but complimentary. We are all trying to bring the fetish -- writ large -- into the "mainstream."
Try to imagine where we are coming from. Hundreds of people here, no doubt, with related interests, trying to advance our cause to the level enjoyed by, say, for example, the ball-gag enthusiasts. And catered to by only a tenth of a percent of the suppliers out there.
We are a tiny minority. So in my view, we tend to tread lightly and take what we can from wherever we can get it.
What we do now, what we ask for -- and what you provide -- at this fledgeling stage, will shape the direction of the fetish for possibly all time!
- GalianaChance
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:39 am
- Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
- Identification: Android
- Gender: Female
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
wjbaines,
When I think of fetishes which are a bit more populated, where there is more room for specialists to cater and still be financially sustained, I think of things like "Female Domination"
... and then I think of the Dommes who do phone sex who I enjoy following on blogs / Twitter. All of them cater to multiple specializations, but none of them cater to the same subset of specializations.
For example: one does hypno, body worship, tease and denial, and feminization -- another does hypno, bondage, pain, humiliation, "forced" intox, and tease and denial.
So what I think is fascinating about being part of a fetish community is the opportunity to explore the sub-genres and find my fit. There are pieces with which I will probably not find resonance, but I'm fascinated to learn which parts I will.
And, honestly, the personal feedback feeds my interest in one direction or another. Because I'm a selfish narcissist, and someone saying "I'd love to see YOU doing X" feeds my ego.
As for bringing the fetish into the mainstream, I know my husband and I are doing what we can. Last weekend, he was bragging about my job to some guy friends at a baby shower (we need to work on his sense of "appropriate", but that's another conversation...), and he got a group of 3 guys to see very clearly what could be hot about it.
And on my "role play" listing that has the robot voice sample, I've had several callers incorporate technosexual themes into their standard fetishes because they knew it was interesting to me (how awesome is that? answer: very awesome).
So we're doing our little part in our little corners of the world!
When I think of fetishes which are a bit more populated, where there is more room for specialists to cater and still be financially sustained, I think of things like "Female Domination"
... and then I think of the Dommes who do phone sex who I enjoy following on blogs / Twitter. All of them cater to multiple specializations, but none of them cater to the same subset of specializations.
For example: one does hypno, body worship, tease and denial, and feminization -- another does hypno, bondage, pain, humiliation, "forced" intox, and tease and denial.
So what I think is fascinating about being part of a fetish community is the opportunity to explore the sub-genres and find my fit. There are pieces with which I will probably not find resonance, but I'm fascinated to learn which parts I will.
And, honestly, the personal feedback feeds my interest in one direction or another. Because I'm a selfish narcissist, and someone saying "I'd love to see YOU doing X" feeds my ego.
As for bringing the fetish into the mainstream, I know my husband and I are doing what we can. Last weekend, he was bragging about my job to some guy friends at a baby shower (we need to work on his sense of "appropriate", but that's another conversation...), and he got a group of 3 guys to see very clearly what could be hot about it.
And on my "role play" listing that has the robot voice sample, I've had several callers incorporate technosexual themes into their standard fetishes because they knew it was interesting to me (how awesome is that? answer: very awesome).
So we're doing our little part in our little corners of the world!
Galiana Chance: Professional phone sex operator with a theater & technical background, trying to improve my role play skills for technosexual callers.
Relevant blog posts: http://galianachance.net/blog/category/technosexual/
Relevant blog posts: http://galianachance.net/blog/category/technosexual/
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 2:45 pm
- x 1
- Contact:
Android demo 01
This video is fantastic. Keep it up.
Cheers
Jason
Montreal QC Canada
Cheers
Jason
Montreal QC Canada
- GalianaChance
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 1:39 am
- Technosexuality: Built and Transformation
- Identification: Android
- Gender: Female
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Jason, Thank you tons!!
Galiana Chance: Professional phone sex operator with a theater & technical background, trying to improve my role play skills for technosexual callers.
Relevant blog posts: http://galianachance.net/blog/category/technosexual/
Relevant blog posts: http://galianachance.net/blog/category/technosexual/
Users browsing this forum: pamalite and 35 guests