Perhaps, though that feels like a poor sort of intelligence to me- one that's only marginally better than our current chatbots and faltering attempts at artificial intelligence. You can solve all of those problems just fine and yet have no genuine comprehension of what those problems might actually be or what impact the solutions have. They'd be non-human in the worst way, viewing the universe as nothing but a mix of inputs and outputs with no real ability to relate to any of it.Svengli wrote:
Hmm,
Within the domain of fembot fetishism, there's a spectrum of likes.
Some like surface mechanical appearances - panels, plastic skin, metal skeletons, metalic skin, etc,
Some like a degree of mechanical actingness, rigid motion, malfunction.
Some the tendency/ability to alternate between seeming a person and seeming a robot
Some like ability to program and control a fembot.
So at one extremely, some might be satisfied with the better-functioning robot sex dolls that look like they might appear with incremental progress and at an other extreme, some would like robots that are containers of a downloaded human consciousness or simulated equivalent with a variety of intermediate forms (say Stepford Wives, biomechancial devices, West World Hosts, etc).
The thing about convincingness is that someone might want a fembot that would indefinitely convincing as a person or person-equivalent and some might want a femobt that was convincing for a "scene" - well, basically a programmable person
Maybe simulated intelligence would be a fembot that's only provisionally convincing where what people are calling an "artificial intelligence" would be a never-distinguishable from human-behaving fembot (IE, always has the potential to "make their own choices"). Suit yourselves, though I've mentioned I think AI should be anything that can solve any problems a human can solve without regard to the "free will" question.
Myself, I want more of a synthesis between the fully human and fully in human- the type of fembot who knows for a fact she is not and never will be a "real" human but chooses to be as much like one as she can manage in spite of any inherent limitations she might have in that respect.
The programmable human aspect on the other hand, is one I find myself especially struggling to wrap my head around. I can understand intellectually why it may be appealing, but from my viewpoint it's little better than a form of slavery or worse because it involves fundamentally altering the mind of an entity that is either sentient or very close to being so.