"Hard" fembots vs. "Soft" fembots: What's your preference?

General chat about fembots, technosexual culture or any other ASFR related topics that do not fit into the other categories below.
stelarfox
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:10 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
x 1
Contact:

Re: "Hard" fembots vs. "Soft" fembots: What's your preferenc

Post by stelarfox » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:41 am

not sure but i think soft, means exactly non human, so if you want rototic features, means hard but tending to soft. I am guessing please feel free to correct me on the definition.
came here babe cyborg.

User avatar
Uncom
Posts: 363
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:12 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
x 14
x 51
Contact:

Re: "Hard" fembots vs. "Soft" fembots: What's your preferenc

Post by Uncom » Sat Feb 04, 2017 9:13 am

h
Last edited by Uncom on Fri Jan 05, 2024 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Esleeper
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:48 am
Technosexuality: Built
Identification: Human
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: "Hard" fembots vs. "Soft" fembots: What's your preferenc

Post by Esleeper » Mon Feb 06, 2017 10:49 pm

stelarfox wrote:not sure but i think soft, means exactly non human, so if you want rototic features, means hard but tending to soft. I am guessing please feel free to correct me on the definition.
Not quite, it means non-robotic. Often to the Gynoid In Name Only extreme.

Post Reply
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests